SAFe SPC Context
This article explores a real-world SPC exam scenario and reinforces core responsibilities.
Exam Question
During the PI Planning, which statement is true about the activities of team breakouts?
(choose the best answer)
A. In team breakouts #1, teams finalize ART PI Risks, impediments, and dependencies
B. In team breakouts #1, teams meet with Business Owners to assign business value
C. In team breakouts #2, teams work to create their final plans
D. In team breakouts #2, teams establish a draft of their business objectives
Correct Answer
C. In team breakouts #2, teams work to create their final plans
Explanation
Correct Answer
C. In team breakouts #2, teams work to create their final plans:
This response aligns with SPC principles and SAFe guidance for this situation.
Incorrect Answers
A. In team breakouts #1, teams finalize ART PI Risks, impediments, and dependencies:
This option misrepresents the responsibilities or mindset of an SPC.
B. In team breakouts #1, teams meet with Business Owners to assign business value:
This option misrepresents the responsibilities or mindset of an SPC.
D. In team breakouts #2, teams establish a draft of their business objectives:
This option misrepresents the responsibilities or mindset of an SPC.
Agile Leadership Insights
- Enablement: SPCs equip teams and leaders with Lean-Agile knowledge.
- Transformation: They actively guide SAFe implementations across the enterprise.
- Scaling Practices: SPCs ensure consistent flow and alignment at all levels.
Relevance to the SPC Exam
This question format mirrors the actual SPC exam. Understanding the SPC’s role and decision-making logic is essential for passing and for leading transformations.
Key Takeaways
- SPCs guide enterprise-wide Lean-Agile adoption.
- SAFe encourages systemic thinking and long-term enablement.
- Traditional, rigid planning approaches are not effective in SAFe.
Conclusion
SPCs play a critical role in embedding Agile practices across an organization. For focused practice, visit our SPC Exam Prep.
Read more: